Dancing with Web stats

'Click' author shares search-behavior secrets

Inman News

Flickr photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ajawin/3635898552/" target=blank>lepiaf.geo</a>.Flickr photo by lepiaf.geo.

While there can be wisdom in crowds, the masses sometimes behave more like lemmings.

Take the buildup to the housing mess, for example: a lot of people making a lot of bad decisions.

As general manager of global research for online metrics company Hitwise, it is Bill Tancer's business to glean useful information from online behavior -- and to understand which information isn't so useful and why.

Author of "Click: What Millions of People Are Doing Online and Why it Matters," Tancer is an expert in marketing, market research and corporate strategy who has previously worked for LookSmart, Zaplet, NBC Internet and Pacific Bell Internet Services.

During a keynote address at the Inman News Real Estate Connect conference in San Francisco, which runs from Aug. 5-7, Tancer will discuss what we can learn from online behavior.

Tancer has used online search statistics to help predict the outcome of reality television competitions such as "Dancing with the Stars" and "American Idol."

In a 2006 blog post, Tancer noted how many people were surprised at how "Dancing with the Stars" darling Stacy Keibler didn't win the competition -- especially because her online search popularity topped the charts compared to other competitors on the show.

Tancer later explained this paradox with the "Stacy Keibler Correction Coefficient": it wasn't the volume of search traffic that was telling in this instance -- it was the type of searches related to Keibler.

He noted in the blog that some of the top-searched sites related to Stacy Keibler were "visited primarily by 18- to 34-year-old males, not the most likely candidates to pick-up the phone and vote for their favorite ballroom dancer" ... and the searches by this online audience didn't always relate specifically to her dancing skills.

Tancer has also looked to Internet statistics as a possible predictor for trends in resale home sales.

"In today's market, when you're thinking about buying a house you're going to turn to the Internet to look at listings and compare prices. If that holds, then the changes, flux in visits to the real estate category overall should be predictive of interest."

So as a commentator on CNBC, Tancer noted that he stood apart from other analysts during a news segment in predicting a monthly rise in resale sales stats based on a rise in online real estate search activity.

Again, the Stacy Keibler Correction Coefficient reared its head. "I was wrong," he said.

"We misinterpreted that interest in (the real estate) category as buyers' interest." But some of the increased traffic was a result of consumers checking home valuations -- not searching for for-sale homes. ...CONTINUED

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by on July 23, 2009 - 5:53am.

I wonder how many men in the 48 year old age group just went and Googled images for Stacy Keibler?

(I know the number is at least one... And now I clearly understand the search volume Ms. Keibler generated.)

This should be a really interesting keynote at Connect. While I think some get "analysis paralysis" (guilty!) when it comes to site stats, it sounds like Bill Tancer can provide some insight into what really matters.

Jay Thompson
Broker / Owner
Thompson's Realty

Blog: www.PhoenixRealEstateGuy.com

.

 
Submitted by Tim Ryan on July 23, 2009 - 5:21pm.

Internet is a jungle for old time marketers. There is really no way to really succeed on the interent without realiable data and research. Accurate site stats allowto form an effective SEO and ultimately sales strategy.

Tim Ryan-Amerivest Realty
http://www.naplesguru.com
http://www.enaplesrealestate.com

 
Submitted by on July 26, 2009 - 5:05am.

Looking forward to Inman and the keynote address.
I hope we get something new and of value in the
area of home buyers online habits and how to use
this info to better connect with them.There seems
to be so much useless data that we hear over and over. Someone needs to focus on how it relates to
real estate buyers specifically and how to use
this data effectively.
Jim Canion

 
Submitted by Robert A. Hulme on July 26, 2009 - 6:18am.

Statistics and Trends have been the guideline for production goals for many years. I am sure that these models will continue to be used for years to come.

The problem that you create when following statistics is that you have a tendency to limit your capacity to perform. It is good to know what has happened in the past, but don't allow the past to keep you from shooting for the stars.

www.Highlanduthomes.com
www.Lehiuthomes.com

 
Submitted by Jerzy (George) Szkup on July 26, 2009 - 7:30am.

George Szkup
www.DestinationTucson.biz

Talking specifically about Real Estate - SEO is great; it can get your website on the first page and within first 5 positions (for a very significant amount dough?). We have around 200,000 Real Estate websites on the internet and around 20 available good keywords? You can expect a 600 websites to "show up" for any keyword.
So, what are my chances of being noticed by a searcher (regardless of econmic conditions)? How close to NILL? - unless I have some other (perhaps old-fashioned) way to get attention? Or a lots of luck? Since the first 14 characters are important, how many (readable) combinations are available?
Of course a good website is a must - but, I remember a statement from years ago about Zizi Gabor (?) on her 14th marriage - she new what to do but wondered how to make it interesting?
Trends or no trends - can you be seen?
George
http://www.DestinationTucson.biz